Barak,
You content that procecuting terrorist suspects in civilian courts would “would be a mockery to our system.” I must vigoursly disagree. No less a source than the Supreme Court of the United States of America finds that it is proper for persons being held by the United States governemnt have due process. In the Court’s 2004 case Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor writing for the plurality wrote “a court that receives a petition for a writ of habeas corpus from an alleged enemy combatant must itself ensure that the minimum requirements of due process are achieved”
In the intervening years since the September 11th attacks, there have been mountains of case law piled up in an attempt to figure our a whole new system in to which to serve justice to these individuals. What is making a mockery of our system is to ignore the established civilian courts. To ignore courts that have very efficient, well documented, and fair rules is not making the country safer. Instead of trying to reinvent the wheel, lets use the finest legal system the world has ever known to bring these criminals to justice.
Works Cited
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld. No. 548 U.S. 557. Supreme Court of the United States. 29 June 2006.
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld. No. 542 U.S. 507. Supreme Court of the United Staes. 28 June 2004.
Johnston, David. “U.S. Will Give Qaeda Suspect a Civilian Trial.” New York Times [New York] 26 February 2009. 06 February 2010.
No comments:
Post a Comment